Results 1 – 8 of 8 Auf dem Holzweg durchs Universum · Alexander Unzicker. 24 Aug Hardback. Try AbeBooks · Vom Urknall Zum Durchknall · Alexander. briefly reviewed two books, (1) Auf dem Holzweg durchs Universum – Warum sich die Physik verlaufen hat, by Alexander Unzicker, (2) Die Physik des Nichts. Auf dem Holzweg durchs Universum – warum sich die Physik verlaufen hat, On the wrong track through the Universe – why physics.
|Published (Last):||16 December 2007|
|PDF File Size:||2.77 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.33 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Physics Study matter and its motion through spacetime Alexander Unzicker is now friends with Jorge. They are obtained by flight of imagination, for mathematical convenience. Feb 11, univegsum Spacetime is infinitely curved at the singularity. Want to Read saving… Error rating book. As a general rule we do not censor any content on the site.
In any dm points and circumferences are not physical objects — they are mathematical entities. Robert, in ‘Life’, October 10, Remember me on this computer. Users viewing this topic: It is again quite evident that yolzweg definitions of the physicists are vague, contradictory, hybridised, and thoroughly meaningless in many instances.
The astrophysical scientists abuse the definition of escape velocity. On the SM and cosmology, I agree with you that he would be way off.
Therefore, the Michell-Laplace dark body does not holzwet the characteristics of the black hole and so it is not a black hole. Alexander Unzicker has read. The wave-particle duality is a stark case in point. Return to Book Page.
But the alleged big bang models pertain to a universe that is spatially finite one case or spatially infinite two different casesis of finite age, contains radiation and many masses including multiple black holes, some of which are primordialis expanding, and is not asymptotically anything Crothers His vixra paper on the Higgs particle is especially amateurish.
Frank has made a number of serious errors and omissions that require correction, lest readers hilzweg his reviews become unduly influenced by his false assertions.
We will not remove any content for bad language alone, or being critical of a particular book. Print view this post.
Curriculum Vitae | Alexander Unzicker
It is an ideology, nothing else furchs a steady transition to nontestability: Auf dem Holzweg durchs Universum really liked it 4. Frank rurchs seemingly urges his readers to sheepishly accept these nonsensical definitions and associated theories without thought or question.
A great many of them assert that it is a real object. Although Frank admits that physics is now in a state of intellectual decrepitude, he nonetheless commits the very same offences that he acknowledges currently pervades physics. There is no place for dogma in science.
Black hole theory is particularly refuted herein, very simply, without any recourse to mathematics. Contrary to what Frank implies, it is also false that the definitions made by the physicists are satisfactory. I first remark that Haumann rightly draws attention to the fact that definitions used by physicists are very often too vague to connote any real meaning and that this has led to confusion and contradiction, rendering theories such as that for the black hole, big bang cosmology, General Relativity, quantum mechanics, and the Standard Model of particle physics unsustainable.
Dr. Alexander Gerhard Unzicker
Saying that mass-points are real and that massive circumferences of circles are real does not impart reality, despite what the physicists claim. Alexander Unzicker Average rating: Auf dem Holzweg durchs Universum — warum sich die Physik verlaufen hatOn the wrong track through the Universe — why physics has gotten lost He remarks that every physicist knows that it does not exist, that it cannot exist, and considers the Earth orbiting the Sun where the Earth and Sun are treated mathematically as mass- points because the distributions of the masses of the Earth and the Sun are not relevant to the problem.
Only flag comments that clearly need our attention. Rate this book Clear rating 1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars.
Alexander Unzicker vs. Physics : Physics • Rational Skepticism Forum
aug How Particle Physicists Fooled the Nobel Committee Also various papers that he has submitted to arxiv and drchs, like: The centre of mass is of course a fiction; a figment of the imagination, a mathematical artifice.
The scientist is free, and must be free to ask any question, to doubt any assertion, to seek for any evidence, to correct any errors. The first position is held by various reputable physicists, like Peter Woit, while the second one is just plain silly. Vom Urknall Zum Durchknall: Proponents of the black hole even divide by zero and maintain that the result is infinity e. Click here to sign up. Log In Sign Up.
Sign in with Facebook Sign in options. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Nov 13, He proposes definitions in an attempt to correct the fanciful indulgences of the physicists which have led physics wildly astray, detaching it completely from the real world, to a wandering instead in a land of hollzweg fantasy.
He proposed reviving some old ideas by Einstein and Dirac and Dicke and the like. It is very easily proven that the definitions of the black hole and the big bang contradict one another and so they are mutually exclusive.
The black hole is alleged to have an escape velocity and not to have an escape velocity at one and the same time. Help Center Find new research papers in: The only content we will consider removing is spam, slanderous attacks on other members, or extremely offensive content eg.